Kotlin vs Java for Android Development: A Detailed Comparison in 2024

First, let's look at the origins and history of each language.

Java was created by Sun Microsystems back in 1995 as a general-purpose programming language. It quickly became one of the most popular languages taught in universities and used in enterprise application development.

When Android was first introduced in 2008, Java was the natural choice as the language for building Android apps. Java allowed Android to leverage existing tools, IDEs, libraries, and a large pool of experienced developers.

Kotlin was created much later by JetBrains and released in 2016. Unlike Java, Kotlin was designed specifically for modern application development and targets the JVM and Android as platforms.

In 2017, Google announced first-class support for Kotlin on Android, making it an official language for Android development alongside Java. Since then, Kotlin's adoption has grown rapidly. Google has invested heavily in Kotlin for Android, even going so far as to rewrite parts of Android's framework code from Java to Kotlin.

So in summary:

Java created in 1995 as general purpose language

Java used for Android since the beginning of 2008

Kotlin was created by JetBrains in 2016 for modern app development

Google adopted Kotlin for Android in 2017

Now let's dive deeper into the key differences between the two languages.

Kotlin and Java are both widely used programming languages for Android development, each with its own pros and cons. However, when it comes to app performance, there are some key differences between Kotlin and Java that developers should understand.

App performance entails a range of factors like startup time, memory usage, CPU load, battery efficiency, and APK size. Optimizing these performance factors results in smoother, more responsive Android apps that delight users. For many real-world apps, Kotlin can deliver better optimization across several performance areas.

However, Java still reigns supreme for Android compatibility across different OS versions and devices. The extensive Java developer community also means more support resources. So Kotlin vs Java needs careful examination depending on the app requirements.

Here's an in-depth look at how Kotlin and Java compare for common Android app performance benchmarks. Understanding these metrics helps decide when Kotlin's advantages outweigh Java's maturity or vice versa.

To clearly demonstrate Kotlin's performance advantages, we need to benchmark it against Java across some key app performance criteria:

By measuring Kotlin vs Java in controlled tests for these metrics, we can quantify the performance gains Kotlin can offer for typical Android workloads. Let's look at some representative benchmarks.

App startup time measures how quickly an app launches from device boot. Kotlin offers faster cold start times since its compiler optimizes and pre-compiles Kotlin code using advanced techniques like trampolines. However, Java enjoys faster warm starts for subsequent launches since optimized bytecode is cached.

So Kotlin wins for cold starts from device boot which creates a snappier first impression. But Java catches up on warm launches thereafter once JIT compilation has occurred.

Kotlin requires less runtime memory in most test cases because of its compact and efficient code. However, the full Kotlin runtime isn't needed for simple apps, in which case Java can be more memory-efficient.

Overall Kotlin has an edge for memory usage, but Java may do better for smaller apps where Kotlin's full runtime foundation is unnecessary.

CPU utilization reflects how efficiently an app uses available CPU cycles. Kotlin generates a more compact bytecode that the Android runtime can optimize better compared to Java bytecode.

As a result, Kotlin consistently has lower CPU usage which helps conserve battery life and keeps the device cooler. Java CPU usage is noticeably higher, especially for large apps with complex code.

For mobile apps, battery drain is a critical performance consideration. Kotlin’s faster and lighter code helps optimize battery consumption. Lower CPU usage and memory footprint result in energy savings.

However, for simpler apps where Kotlin’s full runtime foundation may be unnecessary, Java can prove more battery-efficient. But Kotlin wins for more complex apps with extensive code..

Kotlin produces significantly smaller APK files for most real-world apps because of its concise coding style and lack of verbosity. This reduces install size and also improves loading performance.

But Java can result in even smaller APK sizes for simple apps that don’t require the full Kotlin runtime and framework. So Java may be preferable strictly from a binary size perspective for targeted use cases.

Kotlin can deliver higher and more consistent frame rates during animations and scrolling thanks to its performance profile. For graphics-intensive Android games, Kotlin can provide smoother motion vs Java.

Scrolling also tends to be less choppy with Kotlin. So for apps where UI fluidity is vital, Kotlin has a clear advantage over Java.

One major advantage Kotlin has over Java is its handling of null values. In Java, null references are a huge source of errors and bugs because Java allows variables to be null.

Attempting to access a null reference in Java results in a NullPointerException at runtime. This will crash your app and can be very difficult to debug.

Kotlin takes a different approach. It disallows variables from being null by default. If you want a variable to allow nulls, you have to explicitly declare it.

For example:.

Kotlin supports first-class functions through lambda expressions and higher-order functions. This allows for functional programming alongside object-oriented code.

Lambdas make it easy to pass behavior as method arguments for processing collections:

Kotlin allows developers to add new functionality to existing classes without having to inherit from them or modify the original class. This is accomplished through extension functions.

Extension functions allow you to "extend" a class with new methods and capabilities without touching the original class code. For example, you could add a swap() method to String:

In Kotlin, delegation is a first-class language feature rather than only being available through design patterns in Java.

The by keyword allows delegating implementation of an interface to a helper class:

Java requires manually implementing delegation patterns like composition and aggregation. Kotlin makes delegation a clean, built-in language feature

Kotlin natively supports coroutines to handle concurrency in a simple, performant manner. Coroutines run code concurrently while avoiding threading challenges like deadlocks.

Here is an example coroutine in Kotlin:

n addition to null safety, Kotlin also handles regular type casts smarter than Java does. Kotlin supports "smart casts" which allow the compiler to infer types in a smarter way than Java.

For example, in Java you may have to explicitly cast a variable to a different type before using it:

In Kotlin, the compiler performs these types of casts automatically when it can deduce the actual type of a variable:

After checking the type with is, Kotlin knows that inside the conditional block animal can be treated as Dog without explicitly casting it.

The smart cast allows you to avoid extraneous casting syntax and makes the code more readable. Kotlin is able to infer types in a smarter way than Java which reduces verbosity.

For simple classes that just hold data, Kotlin provides a more concise syntax called data classes. Data classes are like regular classes but require less boilerplate code.

For example, you can define a data class like this:

The data keyword automatically derives common functionality like equals(), hashCode(), toString() and copy() for you based on the properties.

In Java, you'd have to manually override these methods yourself. With Kotlin data classes, you avoid all the extra boilerplate.

Data classes must hold only immutable properties, meaning you can't assign to them after initialization. But you can copy() a data class instance to a new one with changes:

Overall, data classes provide a cleaner and more compact way to create simple classes to hold data without a lot of extra code.

Kotlin provides a cleaner syntax for working with strings by supporting string templates.

String templates allow you to reference variables directly inside a string without concatenation:

You can also run arbitrary logic inside string templates:

String templates make it easier to embed dynamic data and logic directly inside strings.

In Java, you'd have to break the string apart and concatenate it together:

This can quickly become cumbersome, especially for longer strings.

String templates are a Kotlin feature that enables more readable string manipulation than what is possible in Java.

Kotlin provides first class support for creating immutable classes. Immutable classes cannot be changed after they are initialized, making them inherently thread-safe.

To create an immutable class in Kotlin, you simply need to add the val keyword to its properties:

The properties name and age can only be set during initialization. They cannot be changed afterwards.

You can still provide methods that transform the immutable object into a new instance, but the original instance remains unchanged:

To create immutable classes in Java requires extra work like making defensive copies of objects. Kotlin makes immutability simple and concise.

Immutable classes are essential for functional programming. They also avoid entire categories of bugs related to shared mutable state, so Kotlin makes it easier than Java to create thread-safe code.

Kotlin allows functions to specify default values for parameters, making them optional when calling the function. This results in simpler APIs with fewer overloads.

For example:

Now port can be omitted, falling back to the default:

Without default parameters, you'd need to overload the function:

This quickly becomes unreadable with multiple parameters. Default parameters produce a cleaner API.

In Java there is no straightforward way to achieve this without overloaded methods. Default parameters give Kotlin more expressive power.

An inline function is a function that is compiled inline with the code that calls it. This can improve performance by reducing the amount of time spent calling the function.

In Kotlin, inline functions are marked with the inline keyword. When an inline function is called, the code of the function is copied and pasted into the code that calls it. This can improve performance, but it can also increase the size of the generated code.

Inline functions can only be used if they are declared in a top-level function or a member of an object. They cannot be used in local functions or anonymous functions.

Inline functions can be used to improve the performance of code that calls them frequently. They can also be used to avoid the overhead of creating a new object for each function call.

Kotlin's primary constructors are a powerful tool that can help streamline your code. By annotating a constructor with the @Primary annotation, you can make it the default constructor that is called when your class is instantiated. This can be useful when you want to enforce a particular order of initialization for your class.

Type inference is a process of automatically deducing the type by analyzing its usage. In Kotlin, the compiler tries to infer types for local variables, function arguments and return values based on context. By default, all variables are non-null with no explicit type required if initializer is used. We can explicitly specify the type if needed by adding an explicit annotation or using question mark to prevent nullable types from being inferred from context.

Kotlin's Singleton pattern is a way to ensure that only one instance of a particular class exists in the runtime. This can be useful for things like managing database connections or other resources that need to be shared across the application.

Singletons in Kotlin are created by using the object keyword.

Once a Singleton class has been created, you can access its members by using the same syntax as any other class.

If you need to create a Singleton that can be initialized with parameters, you can use a companion object. A companion object is an object that is associated with a particular class. It can be used to hold things like static methods or factory methods.

Kotlin's declaration-site variance is a powerful tool that allows developers to express their type intentions more clearly. By annotating a type with the in or out keyword, we can specify whether a type is covariant or contravariant in its subtyping relation. This gives the compiler more information about our types, which can be used to prevent type errors.

Kotlin's type system is designed to allow nullable and non-nullable types to coexist without the need for explicit conversions. However, there are some cases where the compiler is not able to infer the type of a variable. In these cases, you can use type projections to specify the type of a variable.

Type projections are useful in several situations, for example:

In Kotlin, range expressions are used to create a range of values. There are two types of range expressions:

Kotlin supports operator overloading, which means you can define new behavior for existing operators or create new ones of your own.

For example, the plus operator can be used to add two numbers, concatenate two strings, or combine two lists. Kotlin also provides standard functions for many of the common collection operations, such as contains() and indexOf(), which can be invoked using the infix notation.

Operator overloading can be a powerful tool for creating expressive and readable code. However, it's important to use it sparingly and only when it makes sense. Overloading operators can make your code less predictable and harder to understand.

Kotlin Companion Objects are a great way to store static members of a class. They are similar to Java's static fields and methods. Companion objects are declared using the companion keyword.

One common use of companion objects is to store constants. For example, you might want to store a list of all the countries in the world in a companion object.

Another common use of companion objects is to create static factory methods. These are methods that create instances of a class. For example, you might want to create a static factory method that creates an instance of a Country class from a country code.

Companion objects are a great way to store static members of a class and to create static factory methods.

Java uses type erasure to implement generics, where the compiler erases type parameters and replaces them with object references. This provides backwards compatibility for pre-generics code.

Kotlin does not have type erasure. Code using Kotlin generics cannot be directly called from Java code without wrappers or workarounds.

Java allows type parameters to be specialized with reified to access type information at runtime. This is useful for reflection and type checks.

Kotlin does not support reified type parameters, though the language does offer some workarounds like inline functions.

Java has wildcard types like ? and ? extends Number to support more flexibility in generic methods and classes.

Kotlin lacks direct support for wildcards, though you can approximate similar behavior with nullable types.

Java lets you restrict type parameters with extends, such as <T extends Number> to narrowly define a type. Kotlin does not have bounds on generic type parameters.

Java provides built-in support for unsigned integer types - something Kotlin standard library lacks.

Java has the following unsigned primitive types:

These plain old data types can be useful when you need to:

Java has robust enumerated type support through its enum keyword. Java enums provide:

Additionally, Java enums can:

Kotlin does have basic enum support with the enum class. However, Kotlin enums are more restricted than Java's enums:

Java's more fully-featured enums enable use cases like state machines, options/settings types, and dataclasses with restricted options. The additional capabilities compared to Kotlin enums make them more robust and reusable.

Java supports optimizing tail recursive functions using a `tailrec` annotation. This allows recursive calls without stack overflow errors.

Kotlin does not yet have tail call optimization, though the feature is planned.

Java has pattern matching support in switch statements as of Java 14, allowing matching on data types and shapes rather than just primitive values.

Kotlin does not yet support pattern matching constructs.

Java 9 added immutable List, Set, Map, and Map.Entry types in the java.util.immutable package.

Kotlin relies on third-party immutable collections libraries rather than providing native ones.

Java's ThreadLocal class enables data isolation across threads. Each thread gets its own isolated instance of the variable.

Kotlin relies on third-party concurrency libraries rather than having ThreadLocal built-in.

The java.util.concurrent.atomic package contains useful atomic variable implementations like AtomicLong and AtomicReference.

Kotlin does not offer atomic data types in its standard library.

Java has a well-defined memory model specifying how threads interact around shared memory. This enables complex lock-free and thread-safe programming.

The Kotlin memory model and thread semantics are not currently defined.

Java Checked Exceptions are those which the programmer must take care of. It is up to the programmer to decide how to handle them. For example, if you are writing a method that opens a file, you must catch and handle the FileNotFoundException, which is a checked exception.

Unchecked exceptions, on the other hand, are those which the programmer need not take care of. The compiler will take care of them. For example, if you are writing a method that uses an ArrayList, you need not catch and handle the ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException, which is an unchecked exception.

Primitive types are not classes in Java. This means that they cannot be used to create objects, and they cannot be extended.

Static members in Java are those which are associated with the class, rather than with any specific instance of that class. A static member can be a field, a method, or a nested class.

Static fields are created when the class is loaded, and they are destroyed when the class is unloaded. Static fields are initialized to their default values when the class is loaded. Static fields can be accessed directly by the class name, without the need for an instance of the class.

Static methods cannot access non-static fields or methods directly.

Nested classes are classes that are defined within another class. Nested classes can be static or non-static. Static nested classes can be accessed without an instance of the class.

The ternary operator in Java is a short way to write an if-else statement. The operator consists of three parts: the condition, the result of the condition being true, and the result of the condition being false.

Here's the general form of the operator:

condition ? result-if-true : result-if-false

For example, the following code uses the ternary operator to check whether a variable is positive or negative:

int num = -5;

String result = num > 0 ? "positive" : "negative";

System.out.println(result);

In this case, the condition is num > 0, the result if the condition is true is "positive", and the result if the condition is false is "negative".

You can use the ternary operator to replace a simple if-else statement. However, keep in mind that the ternary operator is not suitable for complex conditions

In the table below, a direct comparison between the two programming languages is made:.

When considering a new language, how easy it is to learn and adopt is an important factor. In general, Kotlin has a lower learning curve than Java for new developers.

For developers just starting out, Kotlin is often simpler to understand than Java. The syntax is more consistent and concise. Basic concepts like functions and classes are frequently less code than equivalent Java. This makes Kotlin more approachable for beginners.

For experienced Java developers, the learning curve can be minimal thanks to Kotlin's interoperability with Java. There is no need to convert an entire codebase to Kotlin. You can mix and match Kotlin into an existing Java project incrementally. Kotlin can call Java, and Java can call Kotlin which makes integration straightforward.

Kotlin is designed to be familiar to Java developers. Unlike some other JVM languages, Kotlin doesn't reject proven Java idioms and patterns. This makes adoption easier for teams with deep Java experience.

So while there is a learning curve for any new language, Kotlin aims to make the transition from Java as smooth as possible. The interoperability and compatibility lowers the cost of incrementally adopting Kotlin.

Now that we've compared Kotlin vs Java in depth, let's summarize some of the key benefits Kotlin offers for Android development:

A major benefit of Kotlin is that it is fully interoperable with Java code. Kotlin was designed to work in harmony with Java to allow gradually adopting Kotlin into an existing Java codebase.

Here are some of the key ways Kotlin interoperates with Java:

This seamless interoperability allows you to start writing new code in Kotlin while still leveraging your existing Java code. You can mix and match Java and Kotlin, calling between the two, within the same project.

For example, you can convert an existing Java class to Kotlin, use Kotlin for new feature development, and still access everything from your Java code without breaking changes. This makes gradually adopting Kotlin into an existing Java project simple and low risk.

The interoperability with Java gives you the benefits of Kotlin without disrupting your existing codebase. You can adopt it incrementally at your own pace while still accessing the entire Java ecosystem.

In addition to its technical advantages over Java, one of Kotlin's biggest selling points is its adoption by major tech companies. The backing of industry leaders like Google, Pinterest, Square, Coursera, and Netflix has boosted Kotlin's credibility as a mature language ready for production use.

Some notable examples of companies using Kotlin include:

However, there are still some benefits Java retains as the incumbent Android language:

One of the biggest advantages of Java is its long history and track record within the Android ecosystem.

Java has been the primary language for Android development since the very beginning in 2005. When Android was first announced by the Android Open Source Project (AOSP), it was clear Java would be the language of choice for the platform.

Over many years, Java has proven to be a mature, reliable language that is well-suited for Android. The Java language specs and Java virtual machine (JVM) have provided a stable core upon which Android has been built.

This long history gives developers confidence that Java has been battle-tested and will continue to be supported by Google and the AOSP for years to come. The extensive experience accumulated over the years gives Java a strong institutional knowledge within the Android community.

As one of the most established enterprise programming languages, Java has an extremely rich ecosystem of open source libraries and frameworks.

Some examples of Java libraries not available for Kotlin include:

Kotlin can call most Java libraries via interoperability. But the fact remains that Java has a much more mature and extensive set of third party libraries due to its long history.

This gives Java developers a leg up when finding libraries for tasks like:

The breadth and depth of high-quality Java libraries makes building complex applications easier.

Given Java's long tenure within Android, it makes sense that most Android developers today are very familiar with the Java language.

For experienced Android developers, Java is like second nature. The syntax, structure, and design patterns are ingrained into their minds. This deep familiarity with Java enables efficient Android development.

Even for those new to Android, knowledge of core Java is a must. Since Java is one of the most commonly used programming languages in the world, it is far easier to find existing Java developers to build an Android team.

The widespread developer familiarity with Java significantly shortens the learning curve compared to other languages like Kotlin or C++. Developers can leverage their existing Java knowledge rather than having to learn a completely new language.

The size and experience level of a language's developer community has direct impacts on hiring ability and available support resources.

Java has distinct advantages in this area:

The massive pool of Java talent makes building an Android team easier. New hires get up to speed quickly thanks to available docs and guides. Experienced developers can leverage community resources to quickly solve issues.

So when starting a new Android project, should you choose Kotlin or stick with tried and true Java? Here are some recommendations:

For existing Java codebases, the best practice is to transition incrementally by adding Kotlin into parts of your app over time.

Once you understand the similarities and differences, you're ready to start integrating Kotlin into your existing Java codebase. Here are the basic steps:

The key is starting small with conversions so you become comfortable with Kotlin. Kotlin's seamless interoperability with Java makes this gradual transition possible.

Here are some top tips to keep in mind as you migrate from Java to Kotlin to ensure a smooth transition:

By following best practices like these, you'll be able to introduce Kotlin at a pace your team can handle. The interoperability with Java makes a gradual transition smooth and low-risk.

Beyond professional development teams, Kotlin is also gaining preference over Java for learning Android development:

This shift follows increased demand from students and educators for teaching modern Android development with Kotlin. The concise syntax makes concepts easier to grasp. Exposure to Kotlin also better prepares students for real-world Android jobs.

Overall, Kotlin has gained momentum as the language of choice for those new to Android development. However, Java remains relevant with continued massive usage.

Given the accelerating adoption of Kotlin, what might the future usage trends look like compared to Java?

So while Kotlin is clearly gaining developer mindshare for Android, Java's entrenchment and interoperability means it will likely remain relevant for some time. Kotlin for new features and Java for legacy code will be a common pattern.

Let's summarize the key points on Kotlin vs Java:

So Kotlin edges out Java in many respects, but Java continues to be a solid choice. I hope this comparison gives you a balanced perspective to decide whether Kotlin or Java is better for your next Android app!

Kotlin vs Java is a complex debate with good arguments on both sides. This comprehensive feature comparison aimed to provide an unbiased look at how the two languages stack up for Android development.

Some of the key Kotlin benefits we covered included its concise and expressive syntax, null safety, faster performance, and interoperability with Java code. Kotlin was designed from the ground up specifically for modern Android development and it shows.

However, Java still retains advantages like stability, maturity, a vast ecosystem of tools and libraries, developer familiarity, and availability of Java talent.

For new Android projects, especially where you are not bound to an existing codebase, Kotlin is likely the best choice. But Java remains a totally viable option. Incrementally integrating Kotlin into legacy Java codebases is a safe migration strategy.

Over time, Kotlin adoption will continue to grow and it has strong momentum for becoming the predominant language for Android apps. But Java will maintain relevance for years to come thanks to its massive install base.

Hopefully this detailed Kotlin vs Java comparison gives you the data you need to make an informed decision for your next Android project. Kotlin has momentum on its side, but you can’t go wrong sticking with tried and true Java either.

If you found value in the article, please also share it on the following platforms: